Speaker summary
⁠31%3 analyzed articles/videos202.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Quincy Adams results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 202.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,288 of 28,364 speakers). This John Quincy Adams is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
John Quincy Adams
Speaker details
Total words: 202.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
14.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos202.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos