Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Flannery results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 402 hits . Analysis detected 4,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,919 of 6,227 authors). This Christopher Flannery is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Christopher Flannery
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst