Speaker summary
⁠51%4 analyzed articles/videos130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Paul Stevens results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 417 faulty-reasoning hits from 130 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,055 of 28,364 speakers). This John Paul Stevens is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
John Paul Stevens
Speaker details
Total words: 130
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
20.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos130 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos