Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John “Jak” Raymond results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 349 faulty-reasoning hits from 289 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,833 of 28,364 speakers). This John “Jak” Raymond is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
John “Jak” Raymond
Speaker details
Total words: 289
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
12.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos289 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.3%18.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 6.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos