Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Curtice results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 92.2% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 169 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,695 of 28,364 speakers). This John Curtice is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
John Curtice
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 77
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
54.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos77 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 92.2%92.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 54.5%54.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.2%18.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 92.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 54.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos