Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video283.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Carmack results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 112.794 hits. Analysis detected 842.024 faulty-reasoning hits from 283.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (22,042 of 28,364 speakers). This John Carmack is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
John Carmack
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠23%John Carmack (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 283.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
15.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos283.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.5%23.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos