Speaker summary
ā 73% 1 analyzed article/video 283.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Carmack results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and False Dilemma , with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 112.794 hits . Analysis detected 842.024 faulty-reasoning hits from 283.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (22,042 of 28,364 speakers). This John Carmack is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. John Carmack
Speaker details
Total words: 283.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 15.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos283.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 40.6% 40.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 23.5% 23.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 22.7% 22.7% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Representativeness Heuris⦠Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst