Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John C. Fraser results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,792 of 28,364 speakers). This John C. Fraser is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
John C. Fraser
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
40.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 40.2%40.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos