Speaker summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos140.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Johann Rehberger results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 140.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,239 of 28,364 speakers). This Johann Rehberger is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Johann Rehberger
Speaker details
Total words: 140.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos140.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos