Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ritoban Mukherjee results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 2,202 hits . Analysis detected 18,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,624 of 6,364 authors). This Ritoban Mukherjee is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Ritoban Mukherjee
Author details
Total words: 27,884
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst