Speaker summary
81% 2 analyzed articles/videos 265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Panzarella results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 86 hits . Analysis detected 587.754 faulty-reasoning hits from 265 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,723 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Panzarella is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Joe Panzarella
Speaker details
Total words: 265
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.4% percentile 12.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos265 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 25.0% 25.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst