Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Garcia results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 444 hits . Analysis detected 1,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,010 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,805 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Michael Garcia
Author details
Total words: 2,010
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.1% 22.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 22.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst