Speaker summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 227.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Arellano results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ad Hominem , and Tu Quoque , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 119 hits . Analysis detected 873.424 faulty-reasoning hits from 227.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,783 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Arellano is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Joe Arellano
Speaker details
Total words: 227.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 12.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos227.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 35.9% 35.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 29.5% 29.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 1.0% Tu Quoque: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst