Speaker summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos75.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joann Ariola results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 586.738 faulty-reasoning hits from 75.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,468 of 28,364 speakers). This Joann Ariola is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Joann Ariola
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠78%Joann Ariola (selected)65%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 75.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
64.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos75.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 85.4%85.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 90.3%90.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 85.4%85.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 29.2%29.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 90.3%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 85.4%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 85.4%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate