Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos652.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesus Cardenas results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 56.4% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 723 faulty-reasoning hits from 652.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (24,981 of 26,730 speakers). This Jesus Cardenas is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Jesus Cardenas
Speaker details
Total words: 652.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
7.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos652.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 56.4%56.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.2%8.2%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos