Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Castaneda results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 194.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,961 of 28,364 speakers). This Jessica Castaneda is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Jessica Castaneda
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos