Speaker summary
78%3 analyzed articles/videos383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Sprague results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 134.624 hits. Analysis detected 576.476 faulty-reasoning hits from 383 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,091 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Sprague is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Jennifer Sprague
Speaker details
Total words: 383
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
10.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos383 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.1%35.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate