Author summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deborah Becker results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 3,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (5,112 of 6,628 authors). This Deborah Becker is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Deborah Becker
Author details
Total words: 5,548
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst