Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Medina results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (2,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Medina is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Jennifer Medina
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠93%Jennifer Medina (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos