Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Parker Molloy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 5,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,997 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,534 authors). This Parker Molloy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Parker Molloy
Author details
Total words: 5,997
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst