Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video114.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Chapman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 93.6% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 304 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,344 of 28,364 speakers). This Jennifer Chapman is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Jennifer Chapman
Speaker details
Total words: 114.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos114.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 93.6%93.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 53.2%53.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 93.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 53.2%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos