Speaker summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video161.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffery Schiffman results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 161.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (35,402 of 37,767 speakers). This Jeffery Schiffman is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Jeffery Schiffman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠7%Jeffery Schiffman (selected)8%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 161.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.3% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos161.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos