The Clinton River is a state-designated water trail. Here’s what you need to know. 4%

By Nina Misuraca Ignaczak5%

7/27/2026, 8:08:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 461 faulty-reasoning hits from 889 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (24,522 of 25,331 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the article peer group.

A group of Planet Detroiters met Sunday morning at Clinton River Heritage Park in Utica and walked a little under a mile into downtown, following the river past a floating dock, a stretch of freshly cut log jam, and a bank thick with Virginia creeper and a few sprigs of poison ivy. 
The subject of the walk was the Clinton River Water Trail. 
The trail has 23 public access points strung between Waterford and Lake St. 
Clair, a set of state-approved maps and numbered safety signs, and a small staff at the watershed council trying to keep all of it current against a river that rearranges itself every time it rains hard. 
Planet Detroiters visited the Clinton River Water Trail launch site in Utica on Sunday, July 27, 2026. 
Group selfie by Nina Ignaczak/Planet Detroit. 
A water trail in 3 parts 
Jeffery Schiffman, watershed planner at the Clinton River Watershed Council, led the walk. 
He started with the name. 
The river is named for DeWitt Clinton, who was governor of New York, not Michigan. 
He championed the Erie Canal, and Michigan boosters hoped that flattering him would help them get a canal of their own dug from Lake St. 
Clair west across the state. 
Construction started, money ran out after about a decade, and remnants of the ditch are still visible north of Utica. 
CRWC itself was founded in 1972 as a consortium of local governments organized to stop the Army Corps of Engineers from channelizing the river. 
It reorganized as a nonprofit in 1994. 
The watershed covers 760 square miles across four counties and is the most populated watershed in Michigan. 
The river runs about 81 miles, 72 of them paddleable. 
It disappears underground in Pontiac, which is why that section shows up red on the water trail maps. 
Schiffman divides the water trail into three personalities. 
The upper river through the Waterford chain of lakes is calm and beginner-friendly. 
The middle stretch from Auburn Hills to Utica drops several hundred feet and demands real skill. 
From Utica down to Lake St. 
Clair, the gradient flattens, the channel widens, and it gets forgiving again. 
Water Trail signage helps paddlers navigate the water trail. 
Photo by Nina Ignaczak. 
Flashy water, fallen trees 
The river is flashy, meaning it rises and falls fast. 
Everything south of Auburn Hills is heavily developed, so rain hits pavement and roofs and arrives in the channel almost immediately. 
High flows pull leaning trees off the banks, and one downed tree is enough to collect everything moving downstream into a log jam. 
(I got pinned to one years ago and had to be pulled out by the Macomb County Sheriff, who thankfully happened to be paddling with us that day, so I asked how that work is going.) 
Better, it turns out, though the balance is delicate. 
Large woody debris is habitat and bank stabilization as well as a hazard, and by state rule anything embedded in the streambank cannot be removed without a permit. 
The specialized contractor who handles most of this work for Macomb County, Oakland County, and Shelby Township tends to notch or trim logs rather than haul them out. 
Some jams stay put for years because there is no way to get equipment to them. 
A known obstruction in Rochester Hills sits at the bottom of a bluff ringed by private homes, Schiffman said. 
New Clinton River plan with more amenities 
The trail earned state designation in 2020, one of a growing number in Southeast Michigan. 
Designation means the state has signed off on the plan, the maps, the signage, and the safety system. 
Numbered safety signs appear every few miles  they’re geocoded so a 911 dispatcher can find you from the number  and are translated into Spanish and Arabic. 
CRWC published a new water trail plan in March. 
Paddler feedback pushed amenities to the top of the list of desired projects. 
There is nowhere to lock a boat at most launches, so career and technical education students in both counties are building kayak racks this year for installation starting in the fall. 
Clinton River Watershed Council watershed planner Jeffery Schiffman points out an area where woody debris has been cleared to make way for paddlers. 
Photo by Nina Ignaczak. 
Six accessible universal launches are now in, with another silted in at River Bends Park awaiting repair. 
The council hired a dedicated water trail coordinator this spring and rolled out interactive Google Maps that load onto your phone and show launches, portages, amenities, and reported log jams. 
There is no registration, no one to check in with, and no one recommends going alone. 
Paddling page, maps and interactive trail maps: crwc.org/recreation/paddling 
2026 Clinton River Water Trail Plan: PDF 
Printable water trail map: PDF 
Report a log jam: reporting form 
USGS stream gauges: Auburn Hills | Sterling Heights | Fraser | Mount Clemens 
Safety signs in Spanish and Arabic: Spanish | Arabic 
Large Woody Debris Manual: PDF 
Outside With Clyde video series, covering nearly the whole river: YouTube playlist 
Clinton River MI Paddle Group on Facebook: group page 
Rentals: Clinton River Canoe & Kayak in Chesterfield, Simple Adventures Paddle Sports 
Macomb County surface water monitoring and E. coli data: macombgov.org 
Michigan Eat Safe Fish guidelines: michigan.gov/eatsafefish 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.5%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 1.5%Confirmation Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.6%Planet Detroit: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.2%Planet Detroit: 1.1%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 2.4%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.5%Planet Detroit: 2.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.6%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.5%Planet Detroit: 3.0%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.1%Planet Detroit: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 2.9%Planet Detroit: 3.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.3%Planet Detroit: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.5%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 0.6%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.9%Planet Detroit: 0.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.3%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 3.0%Planet Detroit: 1.3%Appeal to Authority5.3%This article: 1.8%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.7%Planet Detroit: 0.6%False Dilemma1.8%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.5%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.1%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Circular Reasoning1.5%This article: 3.1%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.6%Planet Detroit: 1.3%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.8%Planet Detroit: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.4%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Burden of Proof2.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.6%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.3%Planet Detroit: 0.9%Anecdotal6.6%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.2%Planet Detroit: 0.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.1%Planet Detroit: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 1.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.3%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 0.0%Planet Detroit: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Nina Misuraca Ignaczak: 1.3%Planet Detroit: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.5%

889 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech759writer words
Selected voice

Jeffery Schiffman

25%flagged-word coverage
130 attributed words100% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -15.8 ptsWriter: 15.8%Jeffery Schiffman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.