Author summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Misuraca Ignaczak results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 2,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,447 of 8,567 authors). This Nina Misuraca Ignaczak is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Nina Misuraca Ignaczak
Author details
Total words: 9,248
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst