Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos85 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jean Kaseya results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 56.5% saturation with 48.017 hits. Analysis detected 130.491 faulty-reasoning hits from 85 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,257 of 28,364 speakers). This Jean Kaseya is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Jean Kaseya

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
28.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos85 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.9%32.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.2%31.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.5%20.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos