Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video273.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Buckel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,259.563 faulty-reasoning hits from 273.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (22,980 of 28,364 speakers). This Jason Buckel is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Jason Buckel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 273.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos273.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 46.3%46.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.0%19.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.1%18.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos