Author summary
54%1 analyzed article/video805 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tessa Bentulan results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 2,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,781 of 6,628 authors). This Tessa Bentulan is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Tessa Bentulan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
43%Tessa Bentulan (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,220
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.4%7.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos