BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Quote-first Misdirection, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 805 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 49.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (11,341 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the article peer group.

Gas taxes, registration fees and title fees help fuel at least half of Maryland’s Transportation Trust Fund. 
But only 22% of spending from that fund goes toward highways, while 53% is allocated to public transit. 
The remaining 25% largely supports ports and airports. 
The spending breakdown comes as the state’s own data suggests more than 75% of Maryland commuters drive alone or carpool to work, while just 5% use public transit. 
The figures prompted Spotlight on Maryland to ask state leaders whether transportation investments align with how Marylanders actually use the transportation system. 
“We’re paying more and more and more and getting less and less out of it,” House Minority Leader Jason Buckel, an Allegany County Republican, told Spotlight on Maryland. 
Buckel said public transit provides value to Maryland but questioned whether ridership levels justify receiving the largest share of transportation funding. 
“I think we’re putting money into these systems based on hopes and dreams and aspirations of public transportation advocates, many of whom are well-meaning. 
 The truth is that ,no matter what we’ve invested in it, Americans and Marylanders by and large need roads. 
They need bridges,” Buckel added. 
“They’re willing to spend for those things.” 
Buckel argued that Maryland should not increase costs on drivers through gas taxes and vehicle fees while directing most transportation dollars elsewhere. 
“We shouldn’t be penalizing that person by charging them more and more in gas taxes, more and more in vehicle registration fees and then taking the bulk of that money, not spending it on things that affect them, but spending it on public transportation that they chose not to take part in,” Buckel said. 
A transportation research nonprofit estimates Maryland drivers lose roughly $12.5 billion annually because of congestion, crashes and roads in need of repair. 
That comes out to roughly $3,500 a year for some drivers. 
“We’ve invested literally billions of dollars into these systems and yet we still have massive traffic issues,” Buckel said. 
“People have a right in America to make choices about how they want to get somewhere.” 
Del. 
Marc Korman, a Montgomery County Democrat who chairs the House Environment and Transportation Committee, declined an interview request but responded to questions by email. 
Korman said transportation investments should not be expected to perfectly mirror current travel patterns. 
“There are always different projects or needs that need attention, so Maryland’s transportation investments will never perfectly align,” Korman wrote. 
He also rejected the notion that transit riders and drivers are competing interests. 
“Lots of transit users also drive (I’m one of them) and a bus can't operate on a road that is not maintained,” Korman wrote. 
“Moreover, a driver does not want every bus or train user to shift to a single-occupancy car that is sitting in front of them in traffic.” 
Spotlight on Maryland requested interviews with several Democratic leaders including Senate President Bill Ferguson and House Speaker Joseline Peña-Melnyk. 
We did not receive responses by deadline. 
Sen. 
Johnny Mautz, a Republican representing Caroline, Dorchester, Talbot and Wicomico counties, said more money needs to go to fixing roads. 
“The problem here is look at the ridership. 
Look at what is being used,” Mautz said. 
“Are mass transit or the roads being used by Maryland commuters? 
The roads are the ones that are being used and they’re being underserved right now.” 
Mautz said the Delmarva Peninsula has a lot of roads but limited transit options. 
“We’re pouring over 50% of our Transportation Trust Fund into mass transit, which has a huge problem with ridership,” Mautz said. 
“You have a lot of mass transit with low use, and you have this huge road network that used to be funded properly.” 
The Moore administration defended its approach, arguing that transportation investments cannot focus solely on how Marylanders travel today. 
“When Governor Moore took office, Maryland was operating off of a transportation system where assets were crumbling and revenue shortfalls were threatening to worsen conditions even further,” the administration said in a statement. 
The administration said transportation spending “can't choose between today and tomorrow  it has to do both,” adding that investments are driven by safety, maintaining infrastructure, reducing congestion and supporting economic development. 
The Maryland Department of Transportation said it first accounts for statutory requirements, operating costs, interjurisdictional agreements and debt service before allocating remaining dollars. 
MDOT said it also seeks to maximize federal funding opportunities, noting highway projects generally receive a larger share of federal support than transit projects. 
In the state's most recent Consolidated Transportation Program, 74% of the State Highway Administration's capital funding came from federal sources. 
*Spotlight on Maryland is a collaboration between FOX45 News, WJLA in Washington, D.C., and The Baltimore Sun. 
Have a story tip? 
Email spotlightonmaryland@sbgtv.com or call 410-467-4670. 
Investigative reporter Tessa Bentulan can be reached at tbentulan@sbgtv.com. 
* 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.4%Tessa Bentulan: 3.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Confirmation Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Tessa Bentulan: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Availability Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Tessa Bentulan: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 3.2%Tessa Bentulan: 3.9%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 2.7%Tessa Bentulan: 4.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.7%This article: 5.3%Tessa Bentulan: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias5.3%This article: 2.4%Tessa Bentulan: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Tessa Bentulan: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 12.8%Tessa Bentulan: 5.3%Baltimore Sun: 5.2%Negativity Bias12.8%This article: 9.7%Tessa Bentulan: 3.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Halo Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Ad Hominem3.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.6%Tessa Bentulan: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Appeal to Authority5.6%This article: 14.8%Tessa Bentulan: 7.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.6%False Dilemma14.8%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Tessa Bentulan: 7.1%Baltimore Sun: 3.6%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.4%Tessa Bentulan: 7.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion15.4%This article: 0.9%Tessa Bentulan: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 9.1%Tessa Bentulan: 2.3%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.4%Tessa Bentulan: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Burden of Proof9.4%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.7%Tessa Bentulan: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Anecdotal4.7%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.5%Tessa Bentulan: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Tessa Bentulan: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Middle Ground1.7%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Special Pleading3.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 12.9%Tessa Bentulan: 3.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection12.9%This article: 8.9%Tessa Bentulan: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice8.9%This article: 6.7%Tessa Bentulan: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Indoctrination6.7%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tessa Bentulan: 8.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Tessa Bentulan: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.2%

805 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers76%attributed speech190writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJason Buckel • 28 words • 100.0% coverageJason Buckel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJason Buckel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Korman • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMarc Korman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Korman • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Korman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Korman • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Korman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSpotlight on Maryland • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJohnny Mautz • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMoore administration • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMoore administration • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMoore administration • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMaryland Department of Transportation • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMaryland Department of Transportation • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageTessa Bentulan • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jason Buckel

98%flagged-word coverage
216 attributed words35% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+26.4 ptsWriter: 11.6%Jason Buckel: 38.0%38.0%Indoctrination+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jason Buckel: 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%Jason Buckel: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Jason Buckel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.