Speaker summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Barnes results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Composition/Division, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,712 of 28,364 speakers). This Jason Barnes is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Jason Barnes
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 70
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
62.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos