Author summary
74% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Zwiezen results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 3,449 hits . Analysis detected 30,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,631 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,108 of 6,296 authors). This Zack Zwiezen is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Zack Zwiezen
Author details
Total words: 22,631
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst