Kotaku73%

The New Roku Update Is Terrible And Everyone Hates It 77%

By Zack Zwiezen74%

7/10/2026, 8:48:34 PM

Keywords: Enshitifcation, Roku, Tv

BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.6% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 3,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,020 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.3% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,161 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the article peer group.

Enshitifcation Roku TV 
Published July 10, 2026 
© Roku / Kotaku / Vitaliy Abbasov (Shutterstock) 
About two weeks ago or so, I booted up the Roku TV in our living room and flopped onto the couch. 
But to my surprise, the TV featured a tutorial-like screen letting me know that Roku had pushed out a big update to the home screen and UI. 
I hated it; however, I figured that after a few days I’d get used to it. 
Nope. 
I still hate the new design. 
And a lot of other Roku users are fed up with one of the best smart TV UIs around getting filled up with ads and algo-powered slots while also seemingly introducing new, terrible bugs. 
Before the update last month, the Roku home screen was a fairly simple, no-frills experience. 
You had your apps and inputs, which you could manually organize how you wanted; some sections labeled clearly on the left; and three boxes at the top which would show “recommended” programs or movies. 
It was snappy, easy to use, simple to tweak, and efficient. 
But the old design also wasn’t filled with tons of bullshit algorithm-powered slots and ads. 
And because companies are desperate to make more money at all costs, the worst phenomenon in the tech world happened as Roku’s home screen suffered a nasty case of enshittification. 
The old layout, fast and clean, was killed without warning and replaced without choice in June . 
Now my Roku home screen is a jumbled mess that looks different every day I boot it up. 
Annoyingly, my various HDMI inputs are no longer pinned to the top like before and instead exist in a weird area labeled “Quick Access,” which is annoying and not as easy to customize. 
There’s also a bunch of new areas on the home screen controlled completely by Roku, which are just more places for them to push content and make money. 
I really don’t need my TV to recommend five different TV shows from services I don’t even subscribe to or use. 
Nobody wants that. 
Some users have figured out ways to make the home screen look more like the old version and shared the steps. 
But the end result isn’t quite the same, and in some cases people have reported that removed sections and features can return, like a “Soccer Zone” that seems to be forced on Roku users during the World Cup no matter how many times people delete it. 
As the update rolled out over the last few weeks, more people have booted up their TV and discovered the new, cluttered, hard-to-use mess, and many are not happy. 
Many want the old home screen back and don’t understand why it was even changed in the first place. 
“The new Roku update is terrible. 
Lost my settings on the Home Screen, cannot change the position of apps,” complained one user on Reddit. 
“Does anyone actually like this new Roku home screen layout?” 
asked one user on Twitter. 
“It’s dogshit and clearly they ripped out custom setup to try and force more ads on you. 
Shame been a supporter from day one, but all good things come to an end.” 
“Can you bring back to old [sic] interface as an option for those who don’t want it?” 
asked a top comment on a video Roku posted about the new update on YouTube. 
“All I see is more ads  while the Software/OS keeps getting more laggy as hell!! 
When will more focus be on speed of all apps and the OS!!??” 
said another person on YouTube. 
If you dig around , you’ll also find people complaining about all kinds of new bugs . 
One that I’m dealing with a lot is a squished screen that appears anytime I turn on my PS5 or Xbox or switch inputs between them. 
And the only way to fix this is to unplug the TV and let it boot back up. 
It seems to have no fix and is so bad that I’m now thinking about buying a new TV for the living room, preferably a non-Roku device. 
Of course, the problem is that finding a smart TV in 2026 that isn’t horrible bullshit is becoming tricky. 
My big, dumb 4K LGTV in my office is still mostly fine, but recently got an update that has literal ads pop up on the bottom when I turn it on or switch inputs. 
I recently messed around with a Google TV and that seemed worse than the current Roku shitshow, which doesn’t give me hope that I’ll be able to replace my living room set with anything decent. 
I know I sound old, but fuck it. 
I miss dumb TVs. 
Just some inputs, and I flipped between them. 
All my devices have YouTube, Netflix, and other such things. 
I don’t need them built into my TV, too. 
But even if I bit the bullet and bought a new TV, the cost for any electronic device in 2026 is going up and up and up. 
I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again: The future fucking sucks, man. 
Also: The people of Roku City deserve better. 
🕹️ Level up your inbox 
Don’t miss the latest reviews, news and tips. 
Sign up for our free newsletter. 
Bose Cuts QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) Back to Record Low, Only Slightly More Than the Original Model’s Lowest Price 
Rotta The Hutt Is Ready To Be The Hottest Halloween Costume Of The Year 
‘Gay As A Service’ Game Bundle Impossible To Find On Steam Because ‘Compliance-In-Advance Is Never Enough To Appease A Zealous Censor’ 
Ubisoft Says Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced Is The ‘Full, Complete Experience’ As Negative Steam Reviews Pile Up Over Microtransactions 
It’s Not Just You, Everyone Is Mad At Roku’s Horrible Update 
God Of War Laufey Promises Physical Disc Version, All But Confirming 2027 Launch 
Everything We Know About Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls , The Next Big Marvel Fighter 
Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced Unit Sales Figures Are The First Ubisoft Has Released In Many Years 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.0%Zack Zwiezen: 4.8%Kotaku: 4.4%Confirmation Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 3.8%Kotaku: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%Zack Zwiezen: 5.4%Kotaku: 4.0%Availability Heuristic16.1%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.8%Kotaku: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 1.1%Kotaku: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Zack Zwiezen: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 1.3%Zack Zwiezen: 4.7%Kotaku: 5.8%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 5.4%Zack Zwiezen: 1.8%Kotaku: 1.1%Loss Aversion5.4%This article: 2.3%Zack Zwiezen: 1.3%Kotaku: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.5%Kotaku: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Zack Zwiezen: 2.1%Kotaku: 2.9%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 16.9%Zack Zwiezen: 4.5%Kotaku: 3.4%Pessimism Bias16.9%This article: 38.6%Zack Zwiezen: 13.7%Kotaku: 13.5%Negativity Bias38.6%This article: 0.9%Zack Zwiezen: 1.9%Kotaku: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.9%This article: 5.7%Zack Zwiezen: 2.1%Kotaku: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error5.7%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Zack Zwiezen: 0.3%Kotaku: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Zack Zwiezen: 2.2%Kotaku: 3.6%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.7%Zack Zwiezen: 2.9%Kotaku: 2.4%Recency Bias13.7%This article: 2.8%Zack Zwiezen: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.8%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.8%This article: 1.7%Zack Zwiezen: 0.7%Kotaku: 1.3%Ad Hominem1.7%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Zack Zwiezen: 2.0%Kotaku: 2.6%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 3.8%Zack Zwiezen: 2.9%Kotaku: 2.3%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 7.2%Zack Zwiezen: 1.2%Kotaku: 1.0%Slippery Slope7.2%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 23.3%Zack Zwiezen: 13.7%Kotaku: 9.4%Hasty Generalization23.3%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.4%Zack Zwiezen: 1.5%Kotaku: 1.1%Bandwagon9.4%This article: 7.7%Zack Zwiezen: 5.2%Kotaku: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 1.7%Zack Zwiezen: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.9%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 14.0%Zack Zwiezen: 3.0%Kotaku: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.0%This article: 0.8%Zack Zwiezen: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.8%This article: 1.8%Zack Zwiezen: 0.9%Kotaku: 0.7%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 29.2%Zack Zwiezen: 9.1%Kotaku: 4.3%Anecdotal29.2%This article: 1.5%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.1%No True Scotsman1.5%This article: 1.5%Zack Zwiezen: 2.0%Kotaku: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.6%Kotaku: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.3%Zack Zwiezen: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.3%This article: 11.2%Zack Zwiezen: 2.0%Kotaku: 2.8%Unattributed Quote11.2%This article: 2.3%Zack Zwiezen: 1.5%Kotaku: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 48.6%Zack Zwiezen: 15.3%Kotaku: 15.3%Biased Writer Voice48.6%This article: 1.6%Zack Zwiezen: 3.4%Kotaku: 2.4%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zack Zwiezen: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Zack Zwiezen: 7.9%Kotaku: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…11.6%

1020 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers10%attributed speech914writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRoku • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageBose • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRotta The Hutt • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageUbisoft • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageGod Of War Laufey • 13 words • 100.0% coverageMarvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls • 14 words • 100.0% coverageUbisoft • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words13% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +95.6 ptsWriter: 4.4%Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-54.3 ptsWriter: 54.3%Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-12.5 ptsWriter: 12.5%Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.