Speaker summary
74% 4 analyzed articles/videos 134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Huffman results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , False Dilemma , and Straw Man , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 76 hits . Analysis detected 407.528 faulty-reasoning hits from 134 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,078 of 27,792 speakers). This Jared Huffman is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Jared Huffman
Speaker details
Total words: 134
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 14.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos134 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 51.2% 51.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 31.7% 31.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 35.2% 35.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.2%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 19.2% Straw Man: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst