Speaker summary
ā 80%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Rutkauski results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Burden of Proof, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 356.897 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.2% and a BS Rank of ā 47% (15,130 of 28,364 speakers). This James Rutkauski is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
James Rutkauski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 47%James Rutkauski (selected)30%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.7% percentile
29.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos115 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.8%48.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 24.4%24.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos