Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Anderton results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (9,056 of 28,364 speakers). This James Anderton is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
James Anderton
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos