Speaker summary
43% 4 analyzed articles/videos 212.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Soboroff results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 57.969 hits . Analysis detected 551.81 faulty-reasoning hits from 212.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,517 of 28,364 speakers). This Jacob Soboroff is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Jacob Soboroff
Speaker details
Total words: 212.667
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 14.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos212.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 27.6% 27.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 27.6% 27.6% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 3.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.9% No True Scotsman: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst