Speaker summary
⁠28%4 analyzed articles/videos105.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Reed results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 105.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (19,454 of 26,780 speakers). This Jack Reed is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
17.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos105.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.3%24.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos