Speaker summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J.B. Pritzker results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 48.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,315 of 28,364 speakers). This J.B. Pritzker is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
J.B. Pritzker
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
48.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.2%30.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos