Speaker summary
50% 29 analyzed articles/videos 1,576.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Katz results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 532 hits . Analysis detected 3,167.759 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,576.333 analyzed words across 29 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,456 of 28,364 speakers). This Israel Katz is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Israel Katz
Speaker details
Total words: 1,576.333
Content count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score29 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst