Speaker summary
42% 19 analyzed articles/videos 504.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 1,623.668 faulty-reasoning hits from 504.667 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,824 of 28,364 speakers). This Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Speaker details
Total words: 504.667
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.4% percentile 6.9% BS Score19 analyzed videos504.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 20.7% 20.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Tu Quoque: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst