Speaker summary
⁠72%4 analyzed articles/videos68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran's IRGC results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and False Dilemma, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 65.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,393 of 28,364 speakers). This Iran's IRGC is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Iran's IRGC
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Content count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.5% percentile
65.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos