Iran War Day 132: U.S. Bombs Iran For Second Night 35%

By Harrison Berger73%

7/9/2026, 7:59:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 687 faulty-reasoning hits from 378 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (14,346 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

The U.S. carried out a bombing campaign against Iran for the second consecutive night, with Iran retaliating with drones and ballistic missiles against American and U.S.-allied bases in the region, as the Iran War entered its 132nd day on Thursday. 
Although CENTCOM said that the U.S. strikes targeted “military” sites, the Financial Times reported that targets included civilian infrastructure, such as railroad bridges on the route to the holy city of Mashhad, where the funeral of assassinated former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is currently taking place. 
FT reported that passenger train services in Iran were disrupted on Thursday morning by the strikes and that electricity infrastructure in southeastern Iran was also hit, cutting off power to parts of the country. 
President Donald Trump has threatened to attack Iran’s bridges and power plants. 
The deputy governor of Iran’s Bushehr province told Iranian state media Thursday that the U.S. also bombed the perimeter of the Bushehr nuclear power plant. 
Iran’s IRGC said it retaliated to U.S. overnight strikes with drone attacks on an early-warning satellite site in Qatar, fuel storage for the U.S. military in Bahrain, and an air defense system in Kuwait. 
The IRGC also reportedly launched missiles at the Ali al-Salem base in Kuwait, the U.S. 
Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, and the Azraq military base in Jordan. 
Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz slowed significantly following U.S. strikes Tuesday and Wednesday, with Kpler reporting that only 13 tankers crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday, compared with an average of 33 per day over the previous week. 
Trump on Wednesday evening said that “Iran just called. 
They want to make a deal very badly,” adding that “they’re sort of crazy. 
But they want to make a deal badly.” 
Trump had earlier in the day said that the memorandum of understanding signed last month was “over.” 
The MOU had served as an interim peace agreement to lay the groundwork for a final deal. 
The price of Brent Crude oil remained elevated at $77.30 on Thursday morning, with AAA reporting the national average price of regular gas at $3.85. 
The post Iran War Day 132: U.S. 
Bombs Iran For Second Night appeared first on The American Conservative . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.6%Harrison Berger: 6.8%The American Conservative: 8.1%Confirmation Bias14.6%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 26.2%Harrison Berger: 5.5%The American Conservative: 3.8%Availability Heuristic26.2%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.1%The American Conservative: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 1.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 4.2%The American Conservative: 3.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 12.5%The American Conservative: 8.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.5%The American Conservative: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.4%The American Conservative: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Harrison Berger: 2.3%The American Conservative: 2.7%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 33.3%Harrison Berger: 12.2%The American Conservative: 10.6%Negativity Bias33.3%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.2%The American Conservative: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.5%The American Conservative: 2.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 9.0%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.6%The American Conservative: 2.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.8%The American Conservative: 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.4%The American Conservative: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.5%The American Conservative: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.0%The American Conservative: 2.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.7%The American Conservative: 2.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 45.2%Harrison Berger: 7.8%The American Conservative: 4.3%Appeal to Authority45.2%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 3.0%The American Conservative: 3.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 2.8%The American Conservative: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 7.1%The American Conservative: 10.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.8%The American Conservative: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.7%Harrison Berger: 7.1%The American Conservative: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion3.7%This article: 4.5%Harrison Berger: 2.1%The American Conservative: 1.6%Begging the Question4.5%This article: 10.6%Harrison Berger: 3.5%The American Conservative: 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.6%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.8%The American Conservative: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.1%The American Conservative: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.0%The American Conservative: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.1%Harrison Berger: 2.5%The American Conservative: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.0%The American Conservative: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.2%The American Conservative: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.3%The American Conservative: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.4%Harrison Berger: 6.5%The American Conservative: 3.4%Unattributed Quote11.4%This article: 2.4%Harrison Berger: 4.3%The American Conservative: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.4%This article: 10.6%Harrison Berger: 10.8%The American Conservative: 17.3%Biased Writer Voice10.6%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.3%The American Conservative: 2.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.2%The American Conservative: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 1.0%The American Conservative: 3.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harrison Berger: 0.4%The American Conservative: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

378 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers35%attributed speech245writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s IRGC • 34 words • 100.0% coverageIran’s IRGC • 15 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s IRGC • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageThe American Conservative • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Iran’s IRGC

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words46% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Unattributed Quote+55.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iran’s IRGC: 55.7%55.7%Biased Writer Voice-16.3 ptsWriter: 16.3%Iran’s IRGC: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.