Speaker summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iranian military results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 26.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,214 of 28,364 speakers). This Iranian military is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Iranian military
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠43%Iranian military (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
26.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 25.9%25.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.6%27.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos