Speaker summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos111.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These IEA results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 182 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,697 of 28,364 speakers). This IEA is worse (more manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
IEA
Speaker ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.7% percentile
33.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos111.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 41.0%41.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos