Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Idahoans United for Women and Families results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 35.28 hits. Analysis detected 171.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,276 of 28,364 speakers). This Idahoans United for Women and Families is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Idahoans United for Women and Families
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
22.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos