Author summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GEOFF MULVIHILL Associated Press results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,046 of 6,172 authors). This GEOFF MULVIHILL Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. GEOFF MULVIHILL Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 3,364
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst