Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos116.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunter Metcalf results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 58.7% saturation with 63.996 hits. Analysis detected 146.996 faulty-reasoning hits from 116.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,450 of 28,364 speakers). This Hunter Metcalf is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Hunter Metcalf

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
37.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos116.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos