Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House of Commons Committee on Standards results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,835 of 28,364 speakers). This House of Commons Committee on Standards is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
House of Commons Committee on Standards
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos22 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos