Author summary
75% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wolfgang Munchau results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,869 hits . Analysis detected 13,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,527 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,148 of 6,315 authors). This Wolfgang Munchau is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Wolfgang Munchau
Author details
Total words: 10,527
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst