Speaker summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hossam Hassan results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Burden of Proof, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.1% saturation with 98 hits. Analysis detected 327.815 faulty-reasoning hits from 144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,075 of 28,364 speakers). This Hossam Hassan is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Hossam Hassan
Speaker details
Total words: 144
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos144 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 40.5%40.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.1%52.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos