Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos86.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hemant Mehta results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 79.2% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 495.389 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 49.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,222 of 28,364 speakers). This Hemant Mehta is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Hemant Mehta
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 86.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
49.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos86.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 79.2%79.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 61.0%61.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 64.6%64.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 58.5%58.5%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 79.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 64.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 61.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 58.5%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos