Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video86.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Jaber results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 63.5% saturation with 61.875 hits. Analysis detected 230.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,867 of 28,364 speakers). This Heather Jaber is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Heather Jaber
Speaker details
Total words: 86.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
27.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos86.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 63.5%63.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.7%52.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 27.7%27.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos